Friday, November 24

There’s always been infighting within UKIP, for a start they never seem to be able to agree upon what the truth is. Depending on who in UKIP you talk to, for example, European legislation accounts for anywhere between 50% and 95% of UK law (the real figure being 9% as I keep telling you!).

Their latest disagreement is even more bizarre. Apparently they can’t even decide on how many elected councillors they have. See this discussion on a UKIP messageboard to see the arguments!

I particularly enjoyed the quote given from UKIP HQ:

“UKIP officials estimate they have between 30 and 50 district and borough councillors”.

I wonder why it is so hard for them to actually count. It’s not as if they even have that many!

Sunday, November 12

Mote in Far-Right Talks

It appears that Ashley Mote, elected as a UKIP MEP in 2004, has been involved in discussions to be part of a united far-right group in the European Parliament.

According to an article in European Voice, Mr Mote has been in negotiations with Bruno Gollnisch, an MEP for Jean Marie Le Pen's Front National, who is behind this latest attempt to unite the far-right.

The proposed 'Transparency and Democracy' group, which would also involve the Flemish separatists Vlaams Belang appeared to be floundering after the Italian separatist party Lega Nord expressed their reluctance to join the group.

New Eurosceptic Campaign

Paul Sykes, who backed UKIP's European election campaign in 2004 to the tune of £1.5 million, launched yet another Eurosceptic campaign recently. In an article published in the Telegraph, we were promised a £10 million campaign, during which "Every man, woman and child will get to know what our relationship with the EU is".

Two weeks on and the campaign seems to be stuck in a bit of a rut. Rather than produce their own research they have simply lifted quotes from other peoples - some of which is used by such noble organisations as the BNP and the National Front. Rather than put up posters they are downloadable so campaigners can print and post them at their own expense.

Their website has not been updated since the start of the campaign. It looks like it has been designed and written by a two-year-old - the staff paid for with Sykes's millions can't even spell Peter Mandelson's name correctly - and the blogs and media section are still blank. The newspaper advertisements (of which there have been four), are remarkably uninspiring.

So much for £10 million. According to my calculations they haven't even spent £500k yet.

As for every man, woman and child getting to know what our relationship with the EU is, there is very little sign of that happening. I did a straw poll survey and asked a political journalist, two political studies students and an A-level student what they knew about the Speak Out campaign. They all gave us the same answer - "what campaign?" When I called The Sun's advertising office, they hadn't heard of it either; and even the people at the Times had to look through their records before they knew what I was talking about.

Their arguments are even weaker than their campaigning. Endless, unsubstantiated figures are wheeled out ad-nauseum, alongside rhetoric that gives the impression that it's not the EU's political structure they don't like, but that fact that it involves co-operating with foreigners.

According to them, over 80% of British laws now come from Brussels (when the figure quoted by the House of Commons library is 9%). Apparently, the Council of Ministers is best compared to Communist regimes in China and Cuba (when the Council is actually made up of democratically elected government ministers)

Sykes was challenged to an open debate about Britain's membership of the EU by the deputy leader of Labour's MEP's, Richard Corbett. He accepted, and the story ran in the Yorkshire Post. Unsurprisingly, his office has still not heard from the Sykes camp two weeks later. Euro sceptics like Sykes and UKIP don't really like scrutiny.

Tuesday, November 7


UKIP have voted almost unanimously to reject a European Parliament resolution seeking to save the lives of 31 000 breast cancer victims each year.

Messieurs Batten, Booth, Clark, Farage, Knapman, Nattras, Titford, Whittaker and Wise appallingly attempted to deny free biannual screening for women aged between 50 and 69 years of age, through which it is hoped early detection would lead to a 90% cure rate.

Fellow anti-socialist Ashley Mote abstained and former member Robert Kilroy-Silk was absent. Again.

Source: European Parliament web site